POSITIVE END-EXPIRATORY PRESSURE SETTING IN COVID-19-RELATED ACUTE RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME: COMPARISON BETWEEN ELECTRICAL IMPEDANCE TOMOGRAPHY, PEEP/FIO2 TABLES, AND TRANSPULMONARY PRESSURE

Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Setting in COVID-19-Related Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Comparison Between Electrical Impedance Tomography, PEEP/FiO2 Tables, and Transpulmonary Pressure

Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Setting in COVID-19-Related Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Comparison Between Electrical Impedance Tomography, PEEP/FiO2 Tables, and Transpulmonary Pressure

Blog Article

Introduction: The best way to titrate the positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in patients suffering from acute respiratory distress syndrome is still matter of debate.Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) is a non-invasive technique that could guide PEEP setting based on an optimized ventilation homogeneity.Methods: For this study, we enrolled the patients with 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19)-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), who required mechanical ventilation and were admitted to the ICU in March 2021.Patients were monitored by an esophageal catheter and a Yellow Dock 32-electrode EIT device.

Within 48 h after the start of mechanical ventilation, different levels of PEEP were applied based Vitamins B upon PEEP/FiO2 tables, positive end-expiratory transpulmonary (PL)/ FiO2 table, and EIT.Respiratory mechanics variables were recorded.Results: Seventeen patients were enrolled.PEEP values derived from EIT (PEEPEIT) were different from those based upon other techniques and has poor in-between agreement.

The PEEPEIT was associated with lower plateau pressure, mechanical power, transpulmonary pressures, and with a higher static compliance (Crs) and homogeneity of ventilation.Conclusion: Personalized PEEP setting derived from EIT may help to achieve a more homogenous distribution of ventilation.Whether this approach may translate in outcome improvement remains to be investigated.

Report this page